You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Flexible IrOx neural electrode for mouse vagus nerve stimulation
Acta Biomaterialia, March 2023
Tao Sun, Téa Tsaava, Joanne Peragine, Christine Crosfield, Maria Fernanda Lopez, Romil Modi, Rohit Sharma, Chunyan Li, Harbaljit Sohal, Eric H. Chang, Loren Rieth
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||7||78%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||1||11%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Doctoral Student||2||15%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||1||8%|
|Student > Master||1||8%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Nursing and Health Professions||1||8%|
|Business, Management and Accounting||1||8%|
|Medicine and Dentistry||1||8%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2023.
All research outputs
of 24,294,767 outputs
Outputs from Acta Biomaterialia
of 4,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 407,402 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Biomaterialia
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,294,767 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,316 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 407,402 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.