↓ Skip to main content

Relationship between surgeon volume and outcomes: a systematic review of systematic reviews

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 2,251)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
50 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
47 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
255 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
210 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Relationship between surgeon volume and outcomes: a systematic review of systematic reviews
Published in
Systematic Reviews, November 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13643-016-0376-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Johannes Morche, Tim Mathes, Dawid Pieper

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 210 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 208 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 38 18%
Other 23 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 8%
Student > Master 15 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 7%
Other 41 20%
Unknown 61 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 91 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 2%
Social Sciences 5 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Other 21 10%
Unknown 74 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 431. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2023.
All research outputs
#67,211
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#3
of 2,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,465
of 423,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#1
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,251 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,329 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.