You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Multigene phylogenetic analysis redefines dung beetles relationships and classification (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae)
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Ecology and Evolution, November 2016
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12862-016-0822-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sergei Tarasov, Dimitar Dimitrov |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 2 | 17% |
United States | 1 | 8% |
Denmark | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 8 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 67% |
Scientists | 2 | 17% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 92 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 16% |
Student > Master | 15 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 15 | 16% |
Researcher | 9 | 10% |
Other | 4 | 4% |
Other | 13 | 14% |
Unknown | 21 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 48 | 52% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 9% |
Environmental Science | 7 | 8% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 2% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
Other | 4 | 4% |
Unknown | 22 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2016.
All research outputs
#5,496,406
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#1,321
of 3,772 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,565
of 423,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#32
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,772 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,329 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.