You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A comparative dosimetric study for treating left-sided breast cancer for small breast size using five different radiotherapy techniques: conventional tangential field, filed-in-filed, Tangential-IMRT, Multi-beam IMRT and VMAT
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Radiation Oncology, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-717x-8-89 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Guang-Hua Jin, Li-Xin Chen, Xiao-Wu Deng, Xiao-Wei Liu, Ying Huang, Xiao-Bo Huang |
| Abstract |
To compare the dosimetry for the left-sided breast cancer treatment using five different radiotherapy techniques. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Philippines | 1 | <1% |
| Slovenia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 102 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 17 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 16% |
| Other | 13 | 12% |
| Researcher | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 26 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 32% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 17 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Mathematics | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 32 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2013.
All research outputs
#17,687,135
of 22,708,120 outputs
Outputs from Radiation Oncology
#1,274
of 2,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,844
of 197,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiation Oncology
#27
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,708,120 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,046 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,213 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.