You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
The Oesophageal Cancer Multidisciplinary Team: Can Machine Learning Assist Decision-Making?
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, January 2023
Navamayooran Thavanesan, Ganesh Vigneswaran, Indu Bodala, Timothy J. Underwood
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||8||57%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||2||14%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||1||7%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||1||7%|
|Student > Postgraduate||1||7%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||3||21%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2023.
All research outputs
of 23,299,593 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
of 2,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 388,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,299,593 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,344 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 388,267 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.