↓ Skip to main content

Climatological circulation in Lake Michigan

Overview of attention for article published in Geophysical Research Letters, November 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Climatological circulation in Lake Michigan
Published in
Geophysical Research Letters, November 2008
DOI 10.1029/2008gl035773
Authors

Dmitry Beletsky, David Schwab

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 29%
Researcher 4 24%
Other 3 18%
Student > Master 2 12%
Lecturer 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 41%
Environmental Science 4 24%
Unspecified 3 18%
Engineering 3 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2016.
All research outputs
#7,716,970
of 12,342,128 outputs
Outputs from Geophysical Research Letters
#7,758
of 12,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,981
of 340,934 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geophysical Research Letters
#258
of 437 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,342,128 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,072 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,934 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 437 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.