↓ Skip to main content

Multidimensional rehabilitation programmes for adult cancer survivors

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
115 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
396 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Multidimensional rehabilitation programmes for adult cancer survivors
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007730.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

David A Scott, Moyra Mills, Amanda Black, Marie Cantwell, Anna Campbell, Chris R Cardwell, Sam Porter, Michael Donnelly

Abstract

Multidimensional rehabilitation programmes (MDRPs) have developed in response to the growing number of people living with and surviving cancer. MDRPs comprise a physical component and a psychosocial component. Studies of the effectiveness of these programmes have not been reviewed and synthesised.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 396 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Unknown 392 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 12%
Student > Master 48 12%
Researcher 40 10%
Student > Bachelor 40 10%
Student > Postgraduate 18 5%
Other 56 14%
Unknown 145 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 84 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 62 16%
Psychology 35 9%
Social Sciences 21 5%
Sports and Recreations 10 3%
Other 25 6%
Unknown 159 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2019.
All research outputs
#20,723,696
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,914
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,916
of 210,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#191
of 204 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,450 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 204 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.