↓ Skip to main content

Reverse Cardiac Remodeling: A Marker of Better Prognosis in Heart Failure

Overview of attention for article published in Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reverse Cardiac Remodeling: A Marker of Better Prognosis in Heart Failure
Published in
Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, January 2015
DOI 10.5935/abc.20150025
Pubmed ID
Authors

José Rosino de Araújo R. Reis Filho, Juliano Novaes Cardoso, Cristina Martins dos Reis Cardoso, Antonio Carlos Pereira-Barretto

Abstract

In heart failure syndrome, myocardial dysfunction causes an increase in neurohormonal activity, which is an adaptive and compensatory mechanism in response to the reduction in cardiac output. Neurohormonal activity is initially stimulated in an attempt to maintain compensation; however, when it remains increased, it contributes to the intensification of clinical manifestations and myocardial damage. Cardiac remodeling comprises changes in ventricular volume as well as the thickness and shape of the myocardial wall. With optimized treatment, such remodeling can be reversed, causing gradual improvement in cardiac function and consequently improved prognosis.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Student > Master 2 5%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 32 76%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 12%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 32 76%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2020.
All research outputs
#4,513,858
of 18,893,921 outputs
Outputs from Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
#56
of 686 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,058
of 406,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
#4
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,893,921 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 686 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 406,094 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.