↓ Skip to main content

Overview of active cesium contamination of freshwater fish in Fukushima and Eastern Japan

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#7 of 116,687)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
12 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
8433 tweeters
facebook
83 Facebook pages
googleplus
3 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Overview of active cesium contamination of freshwater fish in Fukushima and Eastern Japan
Published in
Scientific Reports, April 2013
DOI 10.1038/srep01742
Pubmed ID
Authors

Toshiaki Mizuno, Hideya Kubo

Abstract

This paper focuses on an overview of radioactive cesium 137 (quasi-Cs137 included Cs134) contamination of freshwater fish in Fukushima and eastern Japan based on the data published by the Fisheries Agency of the Japanese Government in 2011. In the area north and west of the Fukushima Nuclear plant, freshwater fish have been highly contaminated. For example, the mean of active cesium (quasi-Cs137) contamination of Ayu (Plecoglossus altivelis) is 2,657 Bq/kg at Mano River, 20-40 km north-west from the plant. Bioaccumulation is observed in the Agano river basin in Aizu sub-region, 70-150 km west from the plant. The active cesium (quasi-Cs137) contamination of carnivorous Salmondae is around 2 times higher than herbivorous Ayu. The extent of active cesium (quasi-Cs137) contamination of Ayu is observed in the entire eastern Japan. The some level of the contamination is recognized even in Shizuoka prefecture, 400 km south-west from the plant.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8,433 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Korea, Republic of 1 1%
Unknown 71 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 20%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Other 6 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 7%
Other 14 19%
Unknown 4 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 16 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 22%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 8%
Chemistry 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Other 18 24%
Unknown 11 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6144. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2022.
All research outputs
#469
of 21,821,479 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#7
of 116,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1
of 173,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,821,479 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 116,687 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,864 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them