You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Depth segmentation of the seismogenic continental crust: The 2008 and 2009 Qaidam earthquakes
Geophysical Research Letters, March 2011
J. R. Elliott, B. Parsons, J. A. Jackson, X. Shan, R. A. Sloan, R. T. Walker
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||3||50%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||22||29%|
|Professor > Associate Professor||6||8%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||4||5%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Earth and Planetary Sciences||48||64%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||1||1%|
|Physics and Astronomy||1||1%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2023.
All research outputs
of 24,607,331 outputs
Outputs from Geophysical Research Letters
of 20,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 112,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geophysical Research Letters
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,607,331 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,745 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 112,653 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.