↓ Skip to main content

Construction and validation of a measure of integrative well-being in seven languages: The Pemberton Happiness Index

Overview of attention for article published in Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
179 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
331 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Construction and validation of a measure of integrative well-being in seven languages: The Pemberton Happiness Index
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1477-7525-11-66
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gonzalo Hervás, Carmelo Vázquez

Abstract

We introduce the Pemberton Happiness Index (PHI), a new integrative measure of well-being in seven languages, detailing the validation process and presenting psychometric data. The scale includes eleven items related to different domains of remembered well-being (general, hedonic, eudaimonic, and social well-being) and ten items related to experienced well-being (i.e., positive and negative emotional events that possibly happened the day before); the sum of these items produces a combined well-being index.

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 331 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 318 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 49 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 47 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 12%
Researcher 33 10%
Student > Bachelor 24 7%
Other 64 19%
Unknown 74 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 145 44%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 6%
Social Sciences 19 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 12 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 2%
Other 43 13%
Unknown 83 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2020.
All research outputs
#2,925,530
of 22,708,120 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#231
of 2,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,181
of 280,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#8
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,708,120 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,154 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,717 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.