You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
A multi-centre retrospective study of Nocardia speciation and antimicrobial susceptibility in Queensland, Australia
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, February 2023
B. Z. Sim, L. Aaron, C. Coulter, J. Parkes-Smith, T. Badrick, K. May, M. Armstrong, S. Hendry, L. Sundac, L. Dang, J. Ho, J. Hanson, S. Smith, K. Choong, A. H. Henderson, E. Bursle
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||23||62%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||6||16%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Economics, Econometrics and Finance||1||33%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2023.
All research outputs
of 24,640,106 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
of 2,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 453,462 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,640,106 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,917 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,462 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.