↓ Skip to main content

Combination formoterol and budesonide as maintenance and reliever therapy versus current best practice (including inhaled steroid maintenance), for chronic asthma in adults and children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Combination formoterol and budesonide as maintenance and reliever therapy versus current best practice (including inhaled steroid maintenance), for chronic asthma in adults and children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007313.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher J Cates, Charlotta Karner

Abstract

Traditionally inhaled treatment for asthma has used separate preventer and reliever therapies. The combination of formoterol and budesonide in one inhaler has made possible a single inhaler for both prevention and relief of symptoms (single inhaler therapy or SiT).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Tunisia 1 1%
Chile 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Korea, Republic of 1 1%
Unknown 66 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 17%
Researcher 12 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 10%
Librarian 5 7%
Other 23 32%
Unknown 1 1%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 56%
Unspecified 7 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Psychology 4 6%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 1 1%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2017.
All research outputs
#3,393,504
of 12,499,603 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,445
of 8,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,344
of 144,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#62
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,499,603 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,781 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.0. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 144,505 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.