↓ Skip to main content

Miscellaneous treatments for neuroleptic-induced tardive dyskinesia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
weibo
1 weibo user
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Miscellaneous treatments for neuroleptic-induced tardive dyskinesia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2003
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000208
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karla Soares-Weiser, Claire B Irving, John Rathbone

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 83 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 13%
Researcher 11 13%
Student > Master 11 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Other 22 26%
Unknown 14 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 39%
Psychology 13 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Neuroscience 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 18 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2017.
All research outputs
#4,154,926
of 22,708,120 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,620
of 12,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,394
of 50,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#13
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,708,120 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,312 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 50,698 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.