↓ Skip to main content
What is this page? Embed badge

Where should hydrology go? An early-career perspective on the next IAHS Scientific Decade: 2023–2032

Overview of attention for article published in Hydrological Sciences Journal, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#10 of 780)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
84 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Summary Twitter
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Where should hydrology go? An early-career perspective on the next IAHS Scientific Decade: 2023–2032
Published in
Hydrological Sciences Journal, March 2023
DOI 10.1080/02626667.2023.2170754
Authors

Theresa C. van Hateren, Harro J. Jongen, Hadeel Al-Zawaidah, Joris G.W. Beemster, Judith Boekee, Linda Bogerd, Sijia Gao, Christin Kannen, Ilja van Meerveld, Sjoukje I. de Lange, Felicia Linke, Rose B. Pinto, Janneke O.E. Remmers, Jessica Ruijsch, Steven R. Rusli, Roeland C. van de Vijsel, Jerom P.M. Aerts, Sehouevi M.D. Agoungbome, Markus Anys, Sara Blanco Ramírez, Tim van Emmerik, Luca Gallitelli, Gabriela Chiquito Gesualdo, Wendy Gonzalez Otero, Sarah Hanus, Zixiao He, Svenja Hoffmeister, Ruben O. Imhoff, Tim Kerlin, Sumit M. Meshram, Judith Meyer, Aline Meyer Oliveira, Andreas C.T. Müller, Remko Nijzink, Mirjam Scheller, Louise Schreyers, Dhruv Sehgal, Paolo F. Tasseron, Adriaan J. Teuling, Michele Trevisson, Kryss Waldschläger, Bas Walraven, Chanoknun Wannasin, Jan Wienhöfer, Mar J. Zander, Shulin Zhang, Jingwei Zhou, Judith Y. Zomer, Bob W. Zwartendijk

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 84 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 26%
Unspecified 2 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Other 3 16%
Unknown 3 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 5 26%
Environmental Science 3 16%
Unspecified 3 16%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2023.
All research outputs
#627,478
of 23,907,431 outputs
Outputs from Hydrological Sciences Journal
#10
of 780 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,562
of 421,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hydrological Sciences Journal
#1
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,907,431 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 780 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,644 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.

This page is provided by Altmetric.