↓ Skip to main content

Negative impacts of invasive plants on conservation of sensitive desert wildlife

Overview of attention for article published in US Geological Survey, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Negative impacts of invasive plants on conservation of sensitive desert wildlife
Published in
US Geological Survey, October 2016
DOI 10.1002/ecs2.1531
Authors

K. Kristina Drake, Lizabeth Bowen, Kenneth E. Nussear, Todd C. Esque, Andrew J. Berger, Nathan A. Custer, Shannon C. Waters, Jay D. Johnson, A. Keith Miles, Rebecca L. Lewison, Drake, K. Kristina, Bowen, Lizabeth, Nussear, Kenneth E., Esque, Todd C., Berger, Andrew J., Custer, Nathan, Waters, Shannon C., Johnson, Jay D., Miles, A. Keith, Lewison, Rebecca L., Custer, Nathan A.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 7%
Unknown 26 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 21%
Researcher 5 18%
Unspecified 5 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 18%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Other 5 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 50%
Unspecified 6 21%
Environmental Science 4 14%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 4%
Other 2 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2017.
All research outputs
#2,973,307
of 13,349,963 outputs
Outputs from US Geological Survey
#317
of 1,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,721
of 374,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age from US Geological Survey
#9
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,349,963 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 77th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,514 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,963 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.