↓ Skip to main content

Aquatic biodiversity in forests: a weak link in ecosystem services resilience

Overview of attention for article published in Biodiversity & Conservation, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Aquatic biodiversity in forests: a weak link in ecosystem services resilience
Published in
Biodiversity & Conservation, June 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10531-016-1148-0
Authors

Brooke E. Penaluna, Deanna H. Olson, Rebecca L. Flitcroft, Matthew A. Weber, J. Ryan Bellmore, Steven M. Wondzell, Jason B. Dunham, Sherri L. Johnson, Gordon H. Reeves

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 79 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 30%
Student > Master 15 19%
Researcher 14 18%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Other 4 5%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 10 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 29 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 23%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 4%
Psychology 3 4%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 20 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2021.
All research outputs
#5,601,807
of 17,345,379 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity & Conservation
#854
of 1,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,905
of 397,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity & Conservation
#21
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,345,379 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,819 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,602 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.