↓ Skip to main content

The Laramide Caborca orogenic gold belt of northwestern Sonora, Mexico; white mica 40Ar/39Ar geochronology from gold-rich quartz veins

Overview of attention for article published in US Geological Survey, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Laramide Caborca orogenic gold belt of northwestern Sonora, Mexico; white mica <sup>40</sup>Ar/<sup>39</sup>Ar geochronology from gold-rich quartz veins
Published in
US Geological Survey, January 2016
DOI 10.3133/ofr20161008
Authors

Aldo Izaguirre, Michael J. Kunk, Alexander Iriondo, Ryan McAleer, Juan Antonio Caballero-Martinez, Enrique Espinosa-Arámburu, Izaguirre, Aldo, Kunk, Michael J., Iriondo, Alexander, McAleer, Ryan J., Caballero-Martinez, Juan Antonio, Espinosa-Arámburu, Enrique

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2018.
All research outputs
#7,807,719
of 12,444,666 outputs
Outputs from US Geological Survey
#926
of 1,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,018
of 357,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age from US Geological Survey
#41
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,444,666 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,439 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,323 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.