You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Laramide Caborca orogenic gold belt of northwestern Sonora, Mexico; white mica <sup>40</sup>Ar/<sup>39</sup>Ar geochronology from gold-rich quartz veins
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
US Geological Survey, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.3133/ofr20161008 |
| Authors |
Aldo Izaguirre, Michael J. Kunk, Alexander Iriondo, Ryan McAleer, Juan Antonio Caballero-Martinez, Enrique Espinosa-Arámburu, Izaguirre, Aldo, Kunk, Michael J., Iriondo, Alexander, McAleer, Ryan J., Caballero-Martinez, Juan Antonio, Espinosa-Arámburu, Enrique |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2018.
All research outputs
#15,395,259
of 22,903,988 outputs
Outputs from US Geological Survey
#1,399
of 2,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#231,046
of 393,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age from US Geological Survey
#37
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,903,988 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,153 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,788 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.