↓ Skip to main content

Alpine biodiversity and assisted migration: the case of the American pika (Ochotona princeps)

Overview of attention for article published in Biodiversity, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#25 of 126)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Alpine biodiversity and assisted migration: the case of the American pika (Ochotona princeps)
Published in
Biodiversity, December 2015
DOI 10.1080/14888386.2015.1112304
Authors

Jennifer L. Wilkening, Chris Ray, Nathan Ramsay, Kelly Klingler

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Unknown 27 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 21%
Researcher 5 18%
Student > Master 4 14%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Other 4 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 61%
Environmental Science 8 29%
Unspecified 2 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 4%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2019.
All research outputs
#2,258,583
of 13,740,867 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity
#25
of 126 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,956
of 377,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,740,867 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 126 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 377,997 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them