↓ Skip to main content

Routine screening of harmful microorganisms in beach sands: Implications to public health

Overview of attention for article published in Science of the Total Environment, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
143 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Routine screening of harmful microorganisms in beach sands: Implications to public health
Published in
Science of the Total Environment, February 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.11.091
Pubmed ID
Authors

R. Sabino, R. Rodrigues, I. Costa, C. Carneiro, M. Cunha, A. Duarte, N. Faria, F.C. Ferreira, M.J. Gargaté, C. Júlio, M.L. Martins, M.B. Nevers, M. Oleastro, H. Solo-Gabriele, C. Veríssimo, C. Viegas, R.L. Whitman, J. Brandão

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 142 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 30 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 13%
Student > Bachelor 19 13%
Student > Master 14 10%
Student > Postgraduate 7 5%
Other 24 17%
Unknown 30 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 26 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 18%
Engineering 8 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Other 32 22%
Unknown 38 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2021.
All research outputs
#6,442,451
of 19,862,278 outputs
Outputs from Science of the Total Environment
#7,362
of 20,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,140
of 412,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science of the Total Environment
#188
of 498 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,862,278 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,347 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 412,141 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 498 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.