↓ Skip to main content

Interbasin Water Transfer, Riverine Connectivity, and Spatial Controls on Fish Biodiversity

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
157 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interbasin Water Transfer, Riverine Connectivity, and Spatial Controls on Fish Biodiversity
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0034170
Pubmed ID
Authors

Evan H. Campbell Grant, Heather J. Lynch, Rachata Muneepeerakul, Muthukumarasamy Arunachalam, Ignacio Rodríguez-Iturbe, William F. Fagan

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 3 2%
South Africa 2 1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 144 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 18%
Researcher 27 17%
Student > Master 23 15%
Student > Bachelor 21 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 28 18%
Unknown 21 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 32%
Environmental Science 44 28%
Engineering 11 7%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 29 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2022.
All research outputs
#7,616,848
of 23,221,875 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#92,230
of 198,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,142
of 161,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,478
of 3,702 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,221,875 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 198,464 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,461 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,702 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.