↓ Skip to main content

Sample design effects in landscape genetics

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Genetics, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
282 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sample design effects in landscape genetics
Published in
Conservation Genetics, October 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10592-012-0415-1
Authors

Sara J. Oyler-McCance, Bradley C. Fedy, Erin L. Landguth

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 282 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 1%
Canada 3 1%
United States 3 1%
Italy 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Guatemala 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 264 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 85 30%
Researcher 68 24%
Student > Master 44 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 8%
Other 12 4%
Other 37 13%
Unknown 14 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 188 67%
Environmental Science 39 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 6%
Physics and Astronomy 3 1%
Arts and Humanities 2 <1%
Other 8 3%
Unknown 24 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2017.
All research outputs
#9,841,670
of 15,473,210 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics
#607
of 785 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#216,765
of 388,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics
#8
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,473,210 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 785 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 388,294 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.