↓ Skip to main content

Candidate cave entrances on Mars

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Caves & Karst Studies, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Candidate cave entrances on Mars
Published in
Journal of Caves & Karst Studies, April 2012
DOI 10.4311/2010ex0167r
Authors

Glen Cushing

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 29%
Student > Master 8 23%
Student > Bachelor 6 17%
Researcher 5 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Other 4 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 15 43%
Physics and Astronomy 6 17%
Engineering 5 14%
Environmental Science 3 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Other 4 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2015.
All research outputs
#3,612,938
of 12,458,271 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Caves & Karst Studies
#3
of 15 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,376
of 359,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Caves & Karst Studies
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,458,271 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one scored the same or higher as 12 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,822 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them