↓ Skip to main content

A metabonomic study to explore potential markers of asymptomatic hyperuricemia and acute gouty arthritis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, February 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#46 of 1,430)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
2 tweeters
Title
A metabonomic study to explore potential markers of asymptomatic hyperuricemia and acute gouty arthritis
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, February 2023
DOI 10.1186/s13018-023-03585-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wei Wang, Jun Kou, Mingmei Zhang, Tao Wang, Wei Li, Yamen Wang, Qingyun Xie, Meng Wei

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2023.
All research outputs
#2,172,760
of 23,372,207 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#46
of 1,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,154
of 360,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#1
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,372,207 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,430 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,936 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.