↓ Skip to main content

Alphacoronaviruses in New World Bats: Prevalence, Persistence, Phylogeny, and Potential for Interaction with Humans

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS ONE, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Alphacoronaviruses in New World Bats: Prevalence, Persistence, Phylogeny, and Potential for Interaction with Humans
Published in
PLoS ONE, May 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0019156
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christina Osborne, Paul M. Cryan, Thomas J. O'Shea, Lauren M. Oko, Christina Ndaluka, Charles H. Calisher, Andrew D. Berglund, Mead L. Klavetter, Richard A. Bowen, Kathryn V. Holmes, Samuel R. Dominguez

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
United Kingdom 2 3%
Brazil 1 1%
China 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Unknown 61 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 21%
Student > Bachelor 10 15%
Student > Master 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 16 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 60%
Environmental Science 6 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 9%
Unspecified 6 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 4%
Other 6 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2015.
All research outputs
#3,449,862
of 12,091,105 outputs
Outputs from PLoS ONE
#47,386
of 133,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,788
of 329,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS ONE
#1,744
of 5,363 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,091,105 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 133,011 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,300 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,363 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.