↓ Skip to main content

Alphacoronaviruses in New World Bats: Prevalence, Persistence, Phylogeny, and Potential for Interaction with Humans

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
2 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
143 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Alphacoronaviruses in New World Bats: Prevalence, Persistence, Phylogeny, and Potential for Interaction with Humans
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0019156
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christina Osborne, Paul M. Cryan, Thomas J. O'Shea, Lauren M. Oko, Christina Ndaluka, Charles H. Calisher, Andrew D. Berglund, Mead L. Klavetter, Richard A. Bowen, Kathryn V. Holmes, Samuel R. Dominguez

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
United States 2 1%
South Africa 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 136 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 17%
Student > Bachelor 20 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 12%
Student > Master 17 12%
Unspecified 11 8%
Other 27 19%
Unknown 27 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 52 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 8%
Unspecified 11 8%
Environmental Science 9 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 7 5%
Other 17 12%
Unknown 35 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2024.
All research outputs
#2,434,395
of 23,956,119 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#30,597
of 204,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,017
of 111,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#279
of 1,654 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,956,119 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 204,506 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,990 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,654 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.