↓ Skip to main content

Alphacoronaviruses in New World Bats: Prevalence, Persistence, Phylogeny, and Potential for Interaction with Humans

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Alphacoronaviruses in New World Bats: Prevalence, Persistence, Phylogeny, and Potential for Interaction with Humans
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0019156
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christina Osborne, Paul M. Cryan, Thomas J. O'Shea, Lauren M. Oko, Christina Ndaluka, Charles H. Calisher, Andrew D. Berglund, Mead L. Klavetter, Richard A. Bowen, Kathryn V. Holmes, Samuel R. Dominguez

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 2 2%
South Africa 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 104 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 20%
Student > Bachelor 19 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 15%
Student > Master 14 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 5%
Other 18 16%
Unknown 15 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 50 45%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 10%
Environmental Science 9 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 7 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 4%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 21 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2021.
All research outputs
#3,888,651
of 19,225,771 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#46,735
of 172,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,190
of 408,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,400
of 5,333 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,225,771 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 172,270 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 408,560 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,333 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.