The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Reservoir characterization of the Mt. Simon Sandstone, Illinois Basin, USA
|
---|---|
Published in |
Energy Procedia, January 2011
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.534 |
Authors |
Scott M. Frailey, James Damico, Hannes E. Leetaru |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 50 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 15 | 30% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
Student > Master | 3 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
Other | 7 | 14% |
Unknown | 12 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 18 | 36% |
Engineering | 7 | 14% |
Environmental Science | 3 | 6% |
Chemical Engineering | 2 | 4% |
Energy | 2 | 4% |
Other | 4 | 8% |
Unknown | 14 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2023.
All research outputs
#3,094,580
of 23,705,225 outputs
Outputs from Energy Procedia
#115
of 2,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,633
of 184,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Energy Procedia
#9
of 207 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,705,225 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,125 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,804 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 207 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.