↓ Skip to main content

The influence of anatomy app use on chiropractic students’ learning outcomes: a randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The influence of anatomy app use on chiropractic students’ learning outcomes: a randomised controlled trial
Published in
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, December 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12998-016-0125-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amanda J. Meyer, Norman J. Stomski, C. Dominique Losco, Anthony J. Armson

Abstract

Anatomy apps supplement traditional learning; however, it is unknown if their use can improve students' outcome. The present study examined whether the use of anatomy apps improved student performance on a neuroanatomy assessment. Second-year anatomy students, enrolled in a Bachelor of Science with Chiropractic Major program, were randomly allocated to experimental and control groups in July 2015. Students completed the Self-Directed Learning Readiness Scale (SDLRS). The experimental group had access to iPads with four anatomy apps for three weekly classes (1.5 h each). One week after the last class, students were assessed by an online 30-question neuroanatomy test. Linear regression was used to examine the association between test scores and app use, gender, previous anatomy unit score and SDLRS scores. Students' views on apps were collected by focus group discussion immediately after the test. Completed questionnaires were obtained from n = 25 control and n = 25 experimental students. There was no association between app use and neuroanatomy assessment score (B = 1.75, 95 % CI: -0.340-3.840, p = 0.099). Only previous anatomy unit score (B = 0.348, 95 % CI: 0.214-0.483, p < 0.001) affected neuroanatomy assessment scores. Students favored apps with clinical images and features including identification pins, sliding bars and rotatable 3D images. App use did not enhance learning outcomes in a second-year anatomy unit.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 9 18%
Student > Bachelor 7 14%
Student > Master 7 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 14%
Researcher 3 6%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 9 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 27%
Psychology 8 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 12%
Computer Science 2 4%
Linguistics 1 2%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 10 20%