↓ Skip to main content

Improving Inferences from Fisheries Capture-Recapture Studies through Remote Detection of PIT Tags

Overview of attention for article published in Fisheries, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Improving Inferences from Fisheries Capture-Recapture Studies through Remote Detection of PIT Tags
Published in
Fisheries, May 2010
DOI 10.1577/1548-8446-35.5.217
Authors

David A. Hewitt, Eric C. Janney, Brian S. Hayes, Rip S. Shively

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 6%
United Kingdom 1 2%
India 1 2%
Colombia 1 2%
Unknown 43 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 27%
Student > Master 10 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 16%
Other 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 9 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 65%
Environmental Science 10 20%
Unspecified 3 6%
Mathematics 1 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Other 2 4%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2019.
All research outputs
#8,559,870
of 13,617,860 outputs
Outputs from Fisheries
#354
of 599 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#206,656
of 377,339 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fisheries
#10
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,617,860 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 599 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 377,339 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.