You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Disease‐specific health‐related quality of life (HRQL) instruments for food allergy: protocol for a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical and Translational Allergy, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2045-7022-3-15 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sarah A Salvilla, Sukhmeet S Panesar, Shyamal Patel, Tamara Rader, Antonella Muraro, Graham Roberts, Bertine Flokstra de‐Blok, Anthony Dubois, Aziz Sheikh, Clinical Immunology Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Guidelines group European Academy of Allergy |
| Abstract |
The European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology is in the process of developing its Guideline for Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis, and this systematic review is one of seven inter-linked evidence syntheses that are being undertaken in order to provide a state-of-the-art synopsis of the current evidence base in relation to epidemiology, prevention, diagnosis and clinical management, and impact on quality of life, which will be used to inform clinical recommendations. The aim of this systematic review will be to determine which validated instruments can be employed to enable assessment of the impact of, and investigations and interventions for, food allergy on health-related quality of life. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 7 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 32 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 20% |
| Researcher | 7 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 14% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 11% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 54% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 9% |
| Psychology | 1 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 6 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2013.
All research outputs
#6,754,036
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#366
of 756 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,257
of 204,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#6
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 756 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,330 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.