↓ Skip to main content

A comparison of algal, macroinvertebrate, and fish assemblage indices for assessing low-level nutrient enrichment in wadeable Ozark streams

Overview of attention for article published in Ecological Indicators, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A comparison of algal, macroinvertebrate, and fish assemblage indices for assessing low-level nutrient enrichment in wadeable Ozark streams
Published in
Ecological Indicators, May 2010
DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.10.007
Authors

B.G. Justus, James C. Petersen, Suzanne R. Femmer, Jerri V. Davis, J.E. Wallace

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 3%
Portugal 2 3%
United States 2 3%
Australia 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Slovenia 1 1%
Unknown 66 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 21%
Student > Master 14 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Other 5 7%
Other 14 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 54%
Environmental Science 25 33%
Unspecified 5 7%
Engineering 3 4%
Materials Science 1 1%
Other 1 1%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2012.
All research outputs
#3,520,708
of 12,277,594 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Indicators
#449
of 1,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,355
of 338,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Indicators
#29
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,277,594 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,407 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,738 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.