↓ Skip to main content

Long-term reductions in anthropogenic nutrients link to improvements in Chesapeake Bay habitat

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
154 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Long-term reductions in anthropogenic nutrients link to improvements in Chesapeake Bay habitat
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, September 2010
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1003590107
Pubmed ID
Authors

Henry A. Ruhl, Nancy B. Rybicki

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 4%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 141 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 44 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 18%
Student > Master 15 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 8%
Other 12 8%
Other 32 21%
Unknown 12 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 55 36%
Environmental Science 48 31%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 12 8%
Unspecified 6 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 2%
Other 10 6%
Unknown 20 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2012.
All research outputs
#5,225,908
of 24,625,114 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#46,893
of 101,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,599
of 99,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#320
of 662 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,625,114 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 101,438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.8. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,450 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 662 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.