↓ Skip to main content

Contrasting Activity Patterns of Sympatric and Allopatric Black and Grizzly Bears

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Wildlife Management, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Contrasting Activity Patterns of Sympatric and Allopatric Black and Grizzly Bears
Published in
Journal of Wildlife Management, November 2010
DOI 10.2193/2009-571
Authors

Charles C. Schwartz, Steven L. Cain, Shannon Podruzny, Steve Cherry, Leslie Frattaroli

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
United Kingdom 3 3%
Canada 3 3%
Japan 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 104 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 27%
Researcher 23 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 18%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Student > Postgraduate 5 4%
Other 14 12%
Unknown 10 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 69 60%
Environmental Science 22 19%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 2%
Computer Science 1 <1%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 11 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2017.
All research outputs
#12,293,351
of 18,710,012 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Wildlife Management
#1,629
of 1,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#234,856
of 405,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Wildlife Management
#23
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,710,012 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,951 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,230 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.