↓ Skip to main content

Dione’s spectral and geological properties

Overview of attention for article published in ICARUS, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

1 policy source


43 Dimensions

Readers on

20 Mendeley
Dione’s spectral and geological properties
Published in
ICARUS, April 2010
DOI 10.1016/j.icarus.2009.07.036

Katrin Stephan, Ralf Jaumann, Roland Wagner, Roger N. Clark, Dale P. Cruikshank, Charles A. Hibbitts, Thomas Roatsch, Harald Hoffmann, Robert H. Brown, G. Filiacchione, Bonnie J. Buratti, Gary B. Hansen, Tom B. McCord, Phil D. Nicholson, Kevin H. Baines

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 2 10%
United States 1 5%
Unknown 17 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 50%
Unspecified 4 20%
Student > Master 3 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 8 40%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 35%
Physics and Astronomy 5 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2012.
All research outputs
of 12,210,645 outputs
Outputs from ICARUS
of 2,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 333,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ICARUS
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,210,645 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,773 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,027 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.