↓ Skip to main content

Dynamic multistate site occupancy models to evaluate hypotheses relevant to conservation of Golden Eagles in Denali National Park, Alaska

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Conservation, November 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dynamic multistate site occupancy models to evaluate hypotheses relevant to conservation of Golden Eagles in Denali National Park, Alaska
Published in
Biological Conservation, November 2009
DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.06.027
Authors

Julien Martin, Carol L. McIntyre, James E. Hines, James D. Nichols, Joel A. Schmutz, Maggie C. MacCluskie

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
India 3 2%
Chile 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 152 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 46 27%
Student > Master 37 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 20%
Other 10 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 5%
Other 24 14%
Unknown 10 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 98 58%
Environmental Science 42 25%
Neuroscience 2 1%
Social Sciences 2 1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 1%
Other 4 2%
Unknown 19 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2019.
All research outputs
#10,072,762
of 15,814,158 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#4,268
of 4,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#217,809
of 389,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#78
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,814,158 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,848 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.1. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 389,719 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.