↓ Skip to main content

Improved prediction and tracking of volcanic ash clouds

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Volcanology & Geothermal Research, September 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Improved prediction and tracking of volcanic ash clouds
Published in
Journal of Volcanology & Geothermal Research, September 2009
DOI 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2008.10.022
Authors

Peter Webley, Larry Mastin

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 74 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 1 1%
Unknown 73 99%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 1%
Unknown 73 99%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2016.
All research outputs
#3,512,327
of 12,257,674 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Volcanology & Geothermal Research
#302
of 1,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,306
of 338,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Volcanology & Geothermal Research
#6
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,257,674 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,034 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,826 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.