↓ Skip to main content

Causes of Bat Fatalities at Wind Turbines: Hypotheses and Predictions

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Mammalogy, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
122 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
460 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Causes of Bat Fatalities at Wind Turbines: Hypotheses and Predictions
Published in
Journal of Mammalogy, December 2009
DOI 10.1644/09-mamm-s-076r1.1
Authors

Paul M. Cryan, Robert M. R. Barclay

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 460 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 2%
Germany 5 1%
Brazil 5 1%
Portugal 4 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Mexico 3 <1%
South Africa 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 423 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 103 22%
Student > Master 102 22%
Other 61 13%
Student > Bachelor 60 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 60 13%
Other 53 12%
Unknown 21 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 284 62%
Environmental Science 95 21%
Engineering 16 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 1%
Other 24 5%
Unknown 29 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2019.
All research outputs
#930,820
of 15,542,184 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Mammalogy
#118
of 2,440 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,377
of 388,609 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Mammalogy
#5
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,542,184 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,440 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 388,609 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.