↓ Skip to main content

Mapping and interpretation of Sinlap crater on Titan using Cassini VIMS and RADAR data

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Geophysical Research, April 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mapping and interpretation of Sinlap crater on Titan using Cassini VIMS and RADAR data
Published in
Journal of Geophysical Research, April 2008
DOI 10.1029/2007je002965
Authors

Stéphane Le Mouélic, Philippe Paillou, Michael A. Janssen, Jason W. Barnes, Sébastien Rodriguez, Christophe Sotin, Robert H. Brown, Kevin H. Baines, Bonnie J. Buratti, Roger N. Clark, Marc Crapeau, Pierre J. Encrenaz, Ralf Jaumann, Dirk Geudtner, Flora Paganelli, Laurence Soderblom, Gabriel Tobie, Steve Wall

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 25%
Student > Master 3 11%
Researcher 3 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 9 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 36%
Physics and Astronomy 7 25%
Design 1 4%
Unknown 10 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2018.
All research outputs
#2,318,923
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Geophysical Research
#716
of 12,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,204
of 95,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Geophysical Research
#8
of 139 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,946 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,222 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 139 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.