↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of the sustainability of deep groundwater as an arsenic-safe resource in the Bengal Basin

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, June 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
104 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
Title
Evaluation of the sustainability of deep groundwater as an arsenic-safe resource in the Bengal Basin
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, June 2008
DOI 10.1073/pnas.0710477105
Pubmed ID
Authors

H. A. Michael, C. I. Voss

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 4%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 1%
India 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Unknown 90 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 29%
Student > Master 19 19%
Researcher 14 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 17 17%
Unknown 6 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 31 32%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 26 27%
Engineering 10 10%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Computer Science 3 3%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 11 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2019.
All research outputs
#2,686,439
of 14,277,842 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#31,591
of 82,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,858
of 380,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#587
of 942 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,277,842 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 77th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 82,244 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 380,055 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 942 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.