You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Genome-based risk assessment for foodborne Salmonella enterica from food animals in China: A One Health perspective
International Journal of Food Microbiology, April 2023
Biao Tang, Abubakar Siddique, Chenhao Jia, Abdelaziz Ed-Dra, Jing Wu, Hui Lin, Min Yue
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||1||100%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Professor > Associate Professor||1||7%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||1||7%|
|Student > Master||1||7%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine||1||7%|
|Immunology and Microbiology||1||7%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2023.
All research outputs
of 23,578,918 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Food Microbiology
of 3,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 299,700 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Food Microbiology
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,578,918 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,529 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,700 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.