↓ Skip to main content

COMPARISON OF REMOTELY DEPLOYED SATELLITE RADIO TRANSMITTERS ON WALRUSES

Overview of attention for article published in Marine Mammal Science, January 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
COMPARISON OF REMOTELY DEPLOYED SATELLITE RADIO TRANSMITTERS ON WALRUSES
Published in
Marine Mammal Science, January 2006
DOI 10.1111/j.1748-7692.2006.00018.x
Authors

Chadwick V. Jay, Mads Peter Heide‐JØrgensen, Anthony S. Fischbach, Mikkel V. Jensen, David F. Tessler, Anders V. Jensen

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 5%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 41 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 39%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 23%
Other 5 11%
Student > Master 4 9%
Professor 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 5 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 59%
Environmental Science 6 14%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 7%
Mathematics 2 5%
Physics and Astronomy 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 5 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2011.
All research outputs
#8,211,309
of 24,602,766 outputs
Outputs from Marine Mammal Science
#650
of 1,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,377
of 162,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Marine Mammal Science
#4
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,602,766 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,382 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.4. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 162,419 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.