↓ Skip to main content

Probabilistic Analysis of Tsunami Hazards*

Overview of attention for article published in Natural Hazards, March 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
283 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
212 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Probabilistic Analysis of Tsunami Hazards*
Published in
Natural Hazards, March 2006
DOI 10.1007/s11069-005-4646-z
Authors

Eric L. Geist, Tom Parsons

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 212 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 3 1%
France 2 <1%
New Zealand 2 <1%
Taiwan 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 195 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 48 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 15%
Student > Master 27 13%
Student > Bachelor 16 8%
Other 15 7%
Other 46 22%
Unknown 28 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 80 38%
Engineering 59 28%
Environmental Science 17 8%
Arts and Humanities 5 2%
Computer Science 5 2%
Other 11 5%
Unknown 35 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2019.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#1,019
of 2,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,431
of 94,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,162 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,607 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them