↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of Local Grid Refinement Methods for MODFLOW

Overview of attention for article published in Ground Water, March 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of Local Grid Refinement Methods for MODFLOW
Published in
Ground Water, March 2006
DOI 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2006.00192.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steffen Mehl, Mary C. Hill, Stanley A. Leake

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 2%
Czechia 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Belgium 1 2%
Denmark 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 52 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 28%
Researcher 9 16%
Student > Master 9 16%
Other 4 7%
Professor 3 5%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 10 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 17 29%
Engineering 12 21%
Environmental Science 10 17%
Chemistry 3 5%
Mathematics 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 11 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2015.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Ground Water
#251
of 893 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,376
of 89,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ground Water
#25
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 893 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 89,733 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.