↓ Skip to main content

小児アトピー性皮膚炎に対するタクロリムス軟膏(プロトピックⓇ軟膏)0.03%小児用の長期の安全性と有効性について―長期特定使用成績調査の最終報告―

Overview of attention for article published in Nihon Hifuka Gakkai zasshi The Japanese journal of dermatology, September 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#11 of 223)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
37 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
小児アトピー性皮膚炎に対するタクロリムス軟膏(プロトピックⓇ軟膏)0.03%小児用の長期の安全性と有効性について―長期特定使用成績調査の最終報告―
Published in
Nihon Hifuka Gakkai zasshi The Japanese journal of dermatology, September 2022
DOI 10.14924/dermatol.132.2327
Authors

大槻 マミ太郎, 海野 一郎, 可児 毅, 松井 慶太, 中川 秀己

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2023.
All research outputs
#1,462,044
of 23,838,611 outputs
Outputs from Nihon Hifuka Gakkai zasshi The Japanese journal of dermatology
#11
of 223 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,061
of 438,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nihon Hifuka Gakkai zasshi The Japanese journal of dermatology
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,838,611 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 223 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,248 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them