You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
小児アトピー性皮膚炎に対するタクロリムス軟膏(プロトピックⓇ軟膏)0.03%小児用の長期の安全性と有効性について―長期特定使用成績調査の最終報告―
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nihon Hifuka Gakkai zasshi The Japanese journal of dermatology, September 2022
|
| DOI | 10.14924/dermatol.132.2327 |
| Authors |
大槻 マミ太郎, 海野 一郎, 可児 毅, 松井 慶太, 中川 秀己 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 12 | 33% |
| Unknown | 24 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 36 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2023.
All research outputs
#1,732,603
of 25,748,735 outputs
Outputs from Nihon Hifuka Gakkai zasshi The Japanese journal of dermatology
#14
of 256 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,172
of 431,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nihon Hifuka Gakkai zasshi The Japanese journal of dermatology
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,748,735 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 256 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,378 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them