The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Distribution of boreal toad populations in relation to estimated UV-B dose in Glacier National Park, Montana, USA
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Journal of Zoology, January 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1139/z05-184 |
| Authors |
Blake R Hossack, Stephen A Diamond, Paul Stephen Corn |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Argentina | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 31 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 27% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 18% |
| Other | 4 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 12% |
| Unknown | 6 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 58% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 15% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 3% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2010.
All research outputs
#8,700,096
of 25,775,807 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Zoology
#761
of 2,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,833
of 175,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Zoology
#8
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,775,807 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,771 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,506 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.