↓ Skip to main content

Sequencing of chemotherapy and radiotherapy for early breast cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sequencing of chemotherapy and radiotherapy for early breast cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005212.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brigid E Hickey, Daniel P Francis, Margot Lehman

Abstract

After surgery for localised breast cancer, radiotherapy (RT) improves both local control and breast cancer-specific survival. In patients at risk of harbouring micro-metastatic disease, adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) improves 15-year survival. However, the best sequence of administering these two types of adjuvant therapy for early-stage breast cancer is unclear.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 100 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 16%
Student > Master 15 14%
Student > Bachelor 14 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 9%
Other 20 19%
Unknown 16 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 48%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 7%
Psychology 6 6%
Unspecified 5 5%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 19 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2013.
All research outputs
#6,596,535
of 12,527,219 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,993
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,938
of 145,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#77
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,219 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 145,784 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.