You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Pitted cones and domes on Mars: Observations in Acidalia Planitia and Cydonia Mensae using MOC, THEMIS, and TES data
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Geophysical Research, May 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1029/2004je002297 |
| Authors |
William H. Farrand, Lisa R. Gaddis, Laszlo Keszthelyi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 52 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 25% |
| Researcher | 12 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 15% |
| Professor | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 22% |
| Unknown | 2 | 4% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 35 | 64% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 5% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 5% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2021.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Geophysical Research
#4,077
of 12,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,007
of 70,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Geophysical Research
#36
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,948 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,836 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.