↓ Skip to main content

Degradation of picric acid and 2,6-DNT in marine sediments and waters: the role of microbial activity and ultra-violet exposure

Overview of attention for article published in Chemosphere, August 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Degradation of picric acid and 2,6-DNT in marine sediments and waters: the role of microbial activity and ultra-violet exposure
Published in
Chemosphere, August 2004
DOI 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.04.039
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marion Nipper, Yaorong Qian, R Scott Carr, Karen Miller

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 42 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Professor 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Unspecified 2 5%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 15 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 7 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 14%
Chemistry 4 9%
Unspecified 2 5%
Computer Science 2 5%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 17 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2016.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Chemosphere
#3,246
of 13,455 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,552
of 61,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chemosphere
#8
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,455 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 61,345 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.