↓ Skip to main content

Multisensory Control of Hippocampal Spatiotemporal Selectivity

Overview of attention for article published in Science, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
123 X users
patent
6 patents
facebook
9 Facebook pages
googleplus
5 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
297 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
610 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Multisensory Control of Hippocampal Spatiotemporal Selectivity
Published in
Science, May 2013
DOI 10.1126/science.1232655
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pascal Ravassard, Ashley Kees, Bernard Willers, David Ho, Daniel A Aharoni, Jesse Cushman, Zahra M Aghajan, Mayank R Mehta

Abstract

The hippocampal cognitive map is thought to be driven by distal visual cues and self-motion cues. However, other sensory cues also influence place cells. Hence, we measured rat hippocampal activity in virtual reality (VR), where only distal visual and nonvestibular self-motion cues provided spatial information, and in the real world (RW). In VR, place cells showed robust spatial selectivity; however, only 20% were track active, compared with 45% in the RW. This indicates that distal visual and nonvestibular self-motion cues are sufficient to provide selectivity, but vestibular and other sensory cues present in RW are necessary to fully activate the place-cell population. In addition, bidirectional cells preferentially encoded distance along the track in VR, while encoding absolute position in RW. Taken together, these results suggest the differential contributions of these sensory cues in shaping the hippocampal population code. Theta frequency was reduced, and its speed dependence was abolished in VR, but phase precession was unaffected, constraining mechanisms governing both hippocampal theta oscillations and temporal coding. These results reveal cooperative and competitive interactions between sensory cues for control over hippocampal spatiotemporal selectivity and theta rhythm.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 123 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 610 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 19 3%
Japan 5 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Belgium 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Other 7 1%
Unknown 567 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 171 28%
Researcher 129 21%
Student > Master 64 10%
Student > Bachelor 40 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 32 5%
Other 100 16%
Unknown 74 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 177 29%
Neuroscience 166 27%
Psychology 47 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 35 6%
Engineering 27 4%
Other 73 12%
Unknown 85 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 168. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2022.
All research outputs
#245,644
of 25,708,267 outputs
Outputs from Science
#6,864
of 83,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,562
of 204,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#62
of 905 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,708,267 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,252 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,978 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 905 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.