Title |
Multisensory Control of Hippocampal Spatiotemporal Selectivity
|
---|---|
Published in |
Science, May 2013
|
DOI | 10.1126/science.1232655 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Pascal Ravassard, Ashley Kees, Bernard Willers, David Ho, Daniel A Aharoni, Jesse Cushman, Zahra M Aghajan, Mayank R Mehta |
Abstract |
The hippocampal cognitive map is thought to be driven by distal visual cues and self-motion cues. However, other sensory cues also influence place cells. Hence, we measured rat hippocampal activity in virtual reality (VR), where only distal visual and nonvestibular self-motion cues provided spatial information, and in the real world (RW). In VR, place cells showed robust spatial selectivity; however, only 20% were track active, compared with 45% in the RW. This indicates that distal visual and nonvestibular self-motion cues are sufficient to provide selectivity, but vestibular and other sensory cues present in RW are necessary to fully activate the place-cell population. In addition, bidirectional cells preferentially encoded distance along the track in VR, while encoding absolute position in RW. Taken together, these results suggest the differential contributions of these sensory cues in shaping the hippocampal population code. Theta frequency was reduced, and its speed dependence was abolished in VR, but phase precession was unaffected, constraining mechanisms governing both hippocampal theta oscillations and temporal coding. These results reveal cooperative and competitive interactions between sensory cues for control over hippocampal spatiotemporal selectivity and theta rhythm. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 32 | 26% |
United States | 11 | 9% |
United Kingdom | 5 | 4% |
Italy | 2 | 2% |
Kuwait | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Ireland | 1 | <1% |
Costa Rica | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Other | 2 | 2% |
Unknown | 66 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 107 | 87% |
Scientists | 12 | 10% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 2% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 19 | 3% |
Japan | 5 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
France | 2 | <1% |
Belgium | 2 | <1% |
Canada | 2 | <1% |
Norway | 1 | <1% |
Austria | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Other | 7 | 1% |
Unknown | 567 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 171 | 28% |
Researcher | 129 | 21% |
Student > Master | 64 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 40 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 32 | 5% |
Other | 100 | 16% |
Unknown | 74 | 12% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 177 | 29% |
Neuroscience | 166 | 27% |
Psychology | 47 | 8% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 6% |
Engineering | 27 | 4% |
Other | 73 | 12% |
Unknown | 85 | 14% |