The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Weathering of sulfidic shale and copper mine waste: secondary minerals and metal cycling in Great Smoky Mountains National Park, Tennessee, and North Carolina, USA
|
---|---|
Published in |
Environmental Geology, July 2003
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00254-003-0856-4 |
Authors |
Jane M. Hammarstrom, Robert R. Seal, Allen L. Meier, John C. Jackson |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 5% |
Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
Australia | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 38 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 10 | 24% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 12% |
Student > Master | 5 | 12% |
Professor | 4 | 10% |
Other | 7 | 17% |
Unknown | 4 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 20 | 48% |
Environmental Science | 9 | 21% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Unknown | 7 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2015.
All research outputs
#4,724,156
of 22,903,988 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Geology
#32
of 359 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,307
of 48,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Geology
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,903,988 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 359 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 48,511 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them