The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Neutrophil conversion to a tumor-killing phenotype underpins effective microbial therapy
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cancer Research, February 2023
|
DOI | 10.1158/0008-5472.can-21-4025 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Andrew O. Yam, Jacqueline Bailey, Francis Lin, Arnolda Jakovija, Scott E. Youlten, Claudio Counoupas, Matthias Gunzer, Tobias Bald, Trent M. Woodruff, James A. Triccas, Leonard D. Goldstein, David Gallego-Ortega, Shane T. Grey, Tatyana Chtanova |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 7 | 18% |
Australia | 4 | 10% |
India | 2 | 5% |
Canada | 2 | 5% |
Paraguay | 1 | 3% |
New Zealand | 1 | 3% |
Argentina | 1 | 3% |
Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
Hong Kong | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Unknown | 17 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 29 | 74% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 10% |
Scientists | 4 | 10% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 24% |
Researcher | 2 | 12% |
Professor | 2 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 12% |
Unknown | 5 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 29% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 12% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 6% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 6 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 78. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2023.
All research outputs
#592,547
of 26,783,796 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Research
#310
of 19,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,159
of 511,910 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Research
#5
of 162 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,783,796 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,445 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 511,910 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 162 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.